Ethical Compliance First
Policy-compliant workflows that follow research-ethics, journal and platform rules.

When the ink dried, your paper stood quietly on shelves.Now, let it dance into the light.


OpenAI


Google Scholar


OpenAI


Google Scholar
Policy-compliant workflows that follow research-ethics, journal and platform rules.
More than a decade in academic dissemination, across all disciplines.
Structured dissemination for 10,000+ journals, built for lasting discoverability.
Press-release distribution to international news outlets.
100+ specialists check every message for accuracy and relevance.
500,000+ active scholars a year, from PhD students to professors.
Real-time analytics and A/B testing across 10+ platforms.
1-on-1 support and a weekly report, start to finish.
Real page layouts, content abstracted. Gold marks every place your paper is shown.
In the home feed and right rail of researchers in your field.
A sponsored post in the feed, and a card in the right rail.
One-to-one, to researchers whose work overlaps yours.
Recommended for you
Recommended for you
A sponsored card below relevant answers, never inside them.
of researchers grew their citations by more than a fifth.
PSL subscribers: Google Scholar, 12+ months of service. Comparison: 50 random active researchers in OpenAlex, growth in 2025. Different databases, not a randomized trial. We don't promise numbers.
Across our historical cases, many papers moved up in citation percentile within their own subfield. Normalized by field, the rise was typically 45–80%.
* This measures standing among peer papers, not raw citation counts. Results vary with research quality, topic and timing.Researchers who actively share their work tend to be seen more, and cited more.
* The data presented is based on our independent research and analysis. Results may vary across fields and contexts.Related peer-reviewed evidence: in a randomized trial of 112 articles, papers promoted on social media gained more citations after one year than unpromoted ones (+3.1 vs +0.7). Luc et al., Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2020.The more people see a paper, the more likely it is to be cited. Impressions widen the pool of potential readers.
Conversion depends on the paper itself (quality, field, clarity) and on its context (trends, awards, timing). We work on impressions; your paper does the rest.
Tap a plan to see what's included.
Every plan has 8 tokens, split evenly across the four channels. Move them to the channel that suits your paper; your total reach stays the same.
* For details, see our Refund Policy
In our experience, 5–10 papers work best.
A good mix:
During the campaign, the system shifts weight towards the papers readers respond to best, or you can set the weights yourself in My Plans → Paper Allocation. Either way, your plan goes as far as it can.
Not sure which to choose? Adding all your papers works too. Over time your most popular papers naturally draw more clicks, and the campaign puts more weight behind them.
Add them in My Papers. You can change the selection at any time.
No. The price is set by the exposure you buy, not by the number of papers.
Yes.
In fast-moving fields such as computer science and AI, much important work is only on arXiv, and you can add it like any other paper.
Many preprints outside top conferences are later published in a journal. When that happens, merge the preprint into the journal version of the paper, so their citations count together.
By the change in your citation rate.
Our citations are natural: more of the right researchers read your paper, and some of them cite it. So the clearest sign is in the totals, where our growth adds to your natural citation rate.
Allow for the delay: over 45% of new citations arrive 6–10 months after researchers first see your paper.
Yes.
Researchers and lab PIs promote their own work all the time: at conferences, on social media, by writing to colleagues. Helping more people discover your research is a normal part of academic life, and it is the work we do.
Our company has worked with journals and publishers for over 10 years and has served more than 10,000 journals, so we know exactly where the line on research misconduct lies.
Several of our full-time colleagues have handled research-ethics cases as research integrity officers at publishers and universities, and hold Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) certificates.
New citations usually take 6–10 months to appear. Signs of interest show up much sooner.
A citation needs a new paper. A researcher who finds your paper runs their experiments, writes their paper and submits it. It then goes through peer review (two rounds on average), is accepted and in press, gets published, and is finally indexed by databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar, which add their own delay.
In the meantime, you can watch the results build in five ways:
Google Scholar
A few questions about your field, papers and goals. We'll estimate what's realistic and suggest a plan.